Keir Starmer to abolish NHS England – the pros and cons

By Peter Sivey, Reader in Health Economics, Centre for Health Economics, University of York

The UK government has announced the abolition of NHS England, phased over two years. In practice, this will involve merging some functions and staff from NHS England into the Department for Health and Social Care (DHSC). As part of the change, the government has stated that it expects to reduce duplication and save hundreds of millions of pounds.

NHS England was established under the Health and Social Care Act of 2012 (the Lansley reforms) and is responsible for commissioning care and overseeing the day-to-day running of the NHS. This involves negotiating budgets for local care provision…

Read complete article

~	From visa-free to visa fees, the UK's new requirements for Trinidad & Tobago nationals stir debate

~	As Mark Carney is sworn in, America’s democratic decline has critical lessons for Canadian voters

~	Keir Starmer promises more ‘democratic control’ of the NHS – how do other European countries do it?

~	Abolishing NHS England could shift power from the centre – but health service overhauls rarely go well

~	Waiting lists, crumbling buildings, staff burnout: five years on, COVID is still hurting the financial health of the NHS

~	People in this career are better at seeing through optical illusions

~	China’s dwindling marriage rate is fuelling demand for brides trafficked from abroad

~	Why are suicide rates so high in bipolar disorder, and what can we do about it?

~	Treatment for Parkinson’s disease and restless leg syndrome is linked with risky behaviour – here’s what you need to know

~	Opus: clunky satire about an evil celebrity cult has plenty to say – it just doesn’t know how to say it