US election pollsters were actually a lot closer than people think – John Curtice

By John Curtice, Professor of Politics, University of Strathclyde and Senior Research Fellow, National Centre for Social Research

Polling of the US election has been widely criticised following the outcome of last Tuesday’s ballot. For weeks in the run-up to polling day the polls were widely reported as saying that the result was too close to call. Not only was there little difference between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris in terms of national vote intentions, but this was also the position in seven “swing” states where the outcome would decide who would win the electoral college vote.

As a result,…

Read complete article

~	Can mobile medicine solve the health crisis in Morocco’s remote villages?

~	A 50-year battle for truth: the Birmingham pub bombings and the price of injustice

~	A common nasal decongestant lacks evidence but is still sold in the UK

~	Grattan on Friday: Marles plays a defensive bat on nuclear as the government rushes to get though late work

~	‘Deep inside, something told me I had found the earliest human ancestor; I went numb’ – Yohannes Haile-Selassie on his lifetime quest to discover ancient humanity

~	Fifty years after the discovery of Lucy, it’s time to ‘decolonise paleoanthropology’ says leading Ethiopian fossil expert – podcast

~	Failed assassination attempt sparks speculations of power struggle in Uzbekistan

~	Reflections on youth-led movements against state repression in Bangladesh and Indonesia

~	Thailand: Dismissal of landmark case a critical and alarming setback in fight against unlawful use of spyware

~	Phenergan for under 6s is now banned due to hallucination fears. Here’s what to use instead